Chaotic nature of river flow time series: upstream to downstream

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Technical and Engineering of Marand, Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Water Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

3 Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey

Abstract

Study the dynamics of runoff in the watershed and how influence of the morphological characteristics is very important in solving water engineering problems. In this paper, the dynamic behavior of the runoff of the four basins located in the Iran, on basin in Turkey and two basins located in United States using chaos theory is studied. There is several stream gauge station in all selected basin. For all basin time series of runoff extraction and then chaotic parameters are calculated. The delay time is determined using the mutual information method, the embedding dimension and correlation dimension is estimated using the false nearest neighbor algorithm and D2 algorithm, respectively. Analysis of the results showed that the correlation dimension has increased from upstream to downstream which constitutes the increasing complexity and number of required variables for modeling. Delay times and embedding dimension do not have relationship with position of the station and values are fairly similar to each other. It is clear that we need more studies to reach a general conclusion on this point.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
 
Abarbanel, H.D.I., 1996. Analysis of observed chaotic data. Springer – Verlag, New York.
De Domenico, M., Ghorbani, M.A., Makarynskyy, O., Makarynska, D. & Asadi, H., 2013. Chaos and reproduction in sea level. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 3687-3697.
Ghorbani, M.A., Kisi, O. & Alinezhad, M., 2010. A probe into the chaotic nature of daily streamflow time series by correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 4050-4057
Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I., 1983. Characterization of strange attractors. Physical review letters, 50(5), 346 p.
Jayawardena, A.W. & Lai, F., 1994. Analysis and prediction of chaos in rainfall and stream flow time series. Journal of hydrology, 153(1-4), 23-52.
Kędra, M., 2014. Deterministic chaotic dynamics of Raba River flow (Polish Carpathian Mountains). Journal of Hydrology. 509(13), 474-503.
Khatibi, R., Sivakumar, B., Ghorbani, M.A., Kisi, O., Koçak, K. & FarsadiZadeh, D., 2012. Investigating chaos in river stage and discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 414-415, 108-117.
Koçak, K., 1997. Application of local prediction model to water level data. A Satellite Conference to the 51st ISI Session in Istanbul, Turkey: Water and Statistics, Ankara-Turkey, 185-193.
Krasovskaia, I., Gottschalk, L. & Kundzewicz, Z.W., 1999. Dimensionality of Scandinavian river flow regimes. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44(5), 705-723.
Li, X., Gao, G., Hu, T., Ma, H. & Li, T., 2014. Multiple time scales analysis of runoff series based on the chaos theory. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(13-15), 2741-2749.
Ng, W.W., Panua, U.S. & Lennox, W.C., 2007. Chaos based Analytical techniques for daily extreme hydrological observations. Journal of Hydrology, 342(1-2), 17-41.
Ondimu, S. & Murase, H., 2007. Reservoir level forecasting using neural networks. Lake Naivasha. Biosystems Engineering, 96(1), 135-138.
Porporato, A. & Ridolfi, L., 1997. Nonlinear analysis of river flow time sequences. Water Resources Research, 33(6), 1353-1367.
Regonda, S., Sivakumar, B. & Jain, A., 2004. Temporal scaling in river flow: Can it be chaotic? Journal of Hydrological Science, 49(3), 373-385.
Sivakumar, B., 2001. Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: A chaotic perspective. Hydrol Earth Sys Sci, 5(4), 645-651.
Sivakumar, B., 2001. Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: A chaotic perspective. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5(4), 645-652.
Sivakumar, B. & Singh, V.P., 2012. Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(11), 4119-4131.
Sivakumar, B., Berndtsson, R. & Persson, M., 2001. Monthly runoff prediction using phase space reconstruction. Hydrological sciences journal, 46(3), 377-387.
Takens, F., 1981. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in Lectures Notes in Mathematics,edited by D.A.Rand and L.S.Young, Springer-Verlag, New York. 898, 366-381.
Tang, Q. & Hu, T., 2010. Testing for Chaos of Yangtze River Streamflow at Different Timescales Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2151-2154.
Wilks, D.S., 1991. Representing serial correlation of meteorological events and forecasts in dynamic decision-analytic models. Monthly Weather Review, 119, 1640-1662.
Sustainable Earth Trends
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
February 2021
Pages 27-34

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics