Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior for Managing Farmer-Wildlife Conflicts in Northern Iran

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

Department of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, Tehran, 1983963113, Iran

Abstract

Effectively managing and mitigating “human-wildlife conflict” (HWC) by adjusting the use of cultivated land to realize the coexistence of humans and wildlife plays an important role in protecting biodiversity, ensuring food security, improving cultivated land use efficiency, and improving the livelihoods of community residents in nature reserves. Moreover, conservation biologists are paying growing attention to HWC, which is a significant global environmental problem. To achieve a sustainable solution and mitigate such conflict, it is necessary to focus on the conflict’s human dimensions and direct and indirect economic and social effects. Human behaviors are affected by values, attitudes, norms, and economic factors. Thus, identifying those factors might be of use to predict human reactions toward wildlife. The framework of this study is a combination of Planned Behavior Theory (TPB) and Wildlife Value Orientations (WVOs) that can identify and predict the behavior of farmers and ranchers in dealing with wildlife by creating a value-attitude-behavior cognitive hierarchy. The study was designed as a stratified random sample of 200 interviewees in Mazandaran province. We used the results (individual characteristics, questions related to conflicts, WVOs, and TPB variables) to analyze and predict the pro-environmental behavior of interviewees in conflict conditions. The results demonstrated that WVOs in total could predict 32% of TPB variables. The attitude and perceived behavior control variables had significant effects on behavioral intention (Respectively, (β = 0.49, p < 0.001) and (β = 0. 21, p < 0.05), and in total, these variables can predict 22% of the pro-environmental behavioral, whereas subjective norms had none. Most notably, combining two theories significantly enhanced the predictive power and comprehensiveness of the ultimate framework for predicting farmers' and ranchers’ pro-environmental behavior. The findings provide a clearer perception of factors driving the non-environmental behavior toward wildlife in conflict situations. So, the TPB and WVOs can be effective tools for investigating and reducing HWC. Also, they can be a basis for developing human-based conflict research in Iran.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Acuna-Marrero, D., Cruz-Modino, R.d.l., Smith, A.N.H., Salinas-de-Leon, P., Pawley, M. D.M. & Anderson, M.J., 2018. Understanding human attitudes towards sharks to promote sustainable coexistence. Marine Policy, 91, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.018
Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control, Springer: 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/97836426974632
Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. & Driver, B.L., 1992. Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of leisure research, 24 (3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889
Amini, T. & Zare, H., 2006. Review of Mazandaran flora biodiversity, natural resources conference, and sustainable development in the south areas of the Caspian Sea, Noor, Islamic Azad University, Noor Branch.
Anthony, B.P., 2021. Paying for the Past: The Importance of Fulfilling Promises as a Key Component to Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflict. Sustainability, 13(13), 7407.
Arlet, M. & Molleman, E.F., 2010. Farmers’ perceptions of the impact of wildlife on small-scale cacao cultivation at the northern periphery of Dja Faunal Reserve, Cameroon. African Primates, 7(1), 27-34.
Babrgir, S., Farhadinia, M.S. & Moqanaki, E.M., 2017. Socio-economic consequences of cattle predation by the Endangered Persian leopard Panthera pardus saxicolor in a Caucasian conflict hotspot, northern Iran. Oryx, 51(1), 124-130.
Bautista, C., Revilla, E., Naves, J., Albrecht, J., Fernández, N., Olszanska, A., Adamec, M., Berezowska-Cnota, T., Ciucci, P. & Groff, C., 2019. Large carnivore damage in Europe: Analysis of compensation and prevention programs. Biological Conservation, 235, 308-316.
Cinner, J., 2018. How behavioral science can help conservation. Science, 362(6417), 889-890. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6028
Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of social theory harvard univ. Press, Cambridge.
Dehshiri, M., 2018. Biodiversity in Iran. In Global Biodiversity, Apple Academic Press. 165-201.
DOEM, Department of the environment of Mazandaran., 2017. Region introduction. (https://mazandaran.doe.ir),
Faham, E., Rezvanfar, A. & Shamekhi, T., 2008. Analysis of socio-economic factors influencing forest dwellers' participation in reforestation and development of forest areas (The case study of West Mazandaran, Iran). American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.438.443
Fazio, R.H., 1986. How do attitudes guide behavior. Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, 1, 204-243.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I., 2011.  Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press.
Fulton, D., Manfredo, M. & Lipscomb, J., 1996. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human dimensions of wildlife, 1(2), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209609359060
George, D. & Mallery, P., 2019. IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
George, D. & Mallery, P., 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gross, E., Jayasinghe, N., Brooks, A., Polet, G., Wadhwa, R. & Hilderink-Koopmans, F., 2021. A future for all: the need for human-wildlife coexistence. WWF, Gland, Switzerland). Design and infographics by Levent Koseoglu, WWF-Netherlands Text editing by ProofreadNOW. com Cover photograph: DNPWC-WWF Nepal.
Homer, P.M. & Kahle, L.R., 1988. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 54(4), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I. & Daigle, J., 2001. Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23(3),165-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896855
Inskip, C., Carter, N., Riley, S., Roberts, T. & MacMillan, D., 2016. Toward human-carnivore coexistence: understanding tolerance for tigers in Bangladesh. PLoS one, 11(1), e0145913.
Kansky, R. & Knight, A.T., 2014. Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation, 179, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.008
Keener-Eck, L.S., Morzillo, A.T. & Christoffel, R.A., 2020. A comparison of wildlife value orientations and attitudes toward timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus). Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 25(1), 47-61.
Kerlinger, P., Burger, J., Cordell, H.K., Decker, D.J., Cole, D.N., Landres, P., Smith, E.N., Brett, J., Larson, R. & O'Shea, T., 2013. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press.
Kheiri, J., 2010. In Review of success rate and impact of livestock removal plan from forest and organizing Forest dwellers of Mazandaran Province, Regional Conference on Social Impact Assessment of Plans, Programs and Policies. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W., 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Liu, F., McShea, W.J., Garshelis, D.L., Zhu, X., Wang, D. & Shao, L., 2011. Human-wildlife conflicts influence attitudes but not necessarily behaviors: Factors driving the poaching of bears in China. Biological Conservation, 144(1), 538-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.009
Lozano, J., Olszańska, A., Morales-Reyes, Z., Castro, A.A., Malo, A.F., Moleon, M., Sanchez-Zapata, J.A., Cortes-Avizanda, A., Wehrden, H., Dorresteijn, I., Kansky, R., Fischer, J. & Martín-Lopez, B., 2019. Human-carnivore relations: a systematic review. Biological Conservation, 237, 480-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002
Manfredo, M.J. & Dayer, A.A., 2004. Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9(4), 1-20.
Manfredo, M.J., Teel, T.L. & Henry, K.L., 2009. Linking society and environment: A multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 407-427.
Manning, A. & Serpell, J., 2002. Animals and human society: Changing perspectives. Routledge.
Marchini, S. & Macdonald, D.W., 2012. Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation, 147(1), 213-221.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.002
McCleery, R.A., 2009. Improving attitudinal frameworks to predict behaviors in human–wildlife conflicts. Society and natural Resources, 22(4), 353-368.
Meinecke, L., Soofi, M., Riechers, M., Khorozyan, I., Hosseini, H., Schwarze, S. & Waltert, M., 2018. Crop variety and prey richness affect spatial patterns of human-wildlife conflicts in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests. Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 165-172.
Nematpour, M. & Habibzadeh, N., 2019. The attitude of Horand’s villagers toward wildlife and determinants of human-wolf conflict, East Azerbaijan, Iran. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 17(3), 259-269.
Nilsson, D., Fielding, K. & Dean, A.J., 2020. Achieving conservation impact by shifting focus from human attitudes to behaviors. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13363
Nyhus, P.J., 2016. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual review of environment and resources, 41, 143-171.
Qashqaei, A.T., Karami, M. & Etemad, V., 2014. Wildlife conflicts between humans and brown bears, Ursus arctos, in the Central Zagros, Iran. Zoology in the Middle East, 60(2), 107-110.
SCI, Statistical Center of Iran., 2014. The publication of the detailed results of a general agricultural survey (www.amar.org.ir).
Seoraj-Pillai, N. & Pillay, N., 2016. A meta-analysis of human–wildlife conflict: South African and global perspectives. Sustainability, 9(1), 34.
Siege, L. & Baldus. R.D., 1998.  Assessment of Crop Damage and Application of Non-Lethal Deterrents for Crop Protection East of Selous Game Reserve; Tanzania wildlife Discussion paper.
Teel, T.L. & Manfredo, M.J., 2007. Exploring the predictive validity of the wildlife value orientation concept across a diverse set of wildlife-related issues. Unpublished manuscript.
Teel, T.L. & Manfredo, M.J., 2010. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation biology, 24(1), 128-139.
Tilson, R. & Seal, U.S., 1987. Tigers of the world: the biology, biopolitics, management, and conservation of an endangered species.
Wallen, K.E. & Daut, E., 2018.  The challenge and opportunity of behaviour change methods and frameworks to reduce demand for illegal wildlife. Nature Conservation, 26, 55-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.26.22725
Ward, C., 2013. Social Dynamics of a Human Wildlife Conflict: Understanding Attitudes and Behaviours towards Yellow-Shouldered Amazon Parrots on Bonaire. Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park, Imperial College London.
Woolaston, K., Flower, E., Van Velden, J., White, S., Burns, G.L. & Morrison. C., 2021. A Review of the Role of Law and Policy in Human-Wildlife Conflict. Conservation & Society, 19(3), 172-183.
Ziaie, H., 2009. A field to the mammals of Iran. the Iran wildlife center (315 p.).
Zinn, H.C. & Shen, X.S., 2007. Wildlife value orientations in China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 331-338.
Zohary, D., 1963. Genetic dimorphism in fruit types in Aegilops speltoides. Heredity, 18(2), 223-231.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics