Evaluation the efficiency of different mulches to combat wind erosion of sandy soil running title: Efficiency of different mulches to control wind erosion

Document Type : Original Research Article


Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran


This study was conducted to determine the most suitable mulch regard to environmental adaptation. It was carried out as a completely randomized design with treatments including cement mulch (50 g cement +100 g sand +1000 ml H2O), two rates of polymer (5 and 10 g polyvinyl acetate + 1000 ml H2O), two rates clay mulches (100 and 200 g zeolite + 1000 ml H2O, 100 and 200 g bentonite + 1000 ml H2O), and control (1000ml H2O). After applying the treatments, trays containing moving sands together with different mulches air dried and the rate of soil erosion was measured during 20, 40 and 60 minutes by wind tunnel at a speed of 85 km h-1. In addition, the penetration resistance, the abrasion resistance, crust thickness, and the impact strength were measured. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. The results of this study showed that the applied treatments increased the penetration resistance, crust thickness, impact strength, and abrasion resistance and reduced the wind erosion; so that 10g of polymer mulch and 200 g bentonite have the highest resistance against wind erosion and are recommended as suitable treatments for stabilization the moving sands in arid lands such as studied area.


Main Subjects

  1. -Alex, S., Vinu, T., 2016. Effect of Resin on the Strength Characteristics of Thonnakkal Clay, International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 6(7), 31-33.
  2. -Charman, P.E., Murphy, B.W., eds., 2007. Soils: their properties and management. Oxford university press, USA.
  3. -Chepil, W.S., 1957. Dust bowl: causes and effects. J Soil Water Cons, 12, 108-111.
  4. -Cornelis, W.M., Gabriels, D., Hartmann, R., 2004. A parameterisation for the threshold shear velocity to initiate deflation of dry and wet sediment. Geomorphology, 59(1-4), 43-51.
  5. -Diouf, B., Skidmore, E.L., Layton, J.B., Hagen, L.J., 1990. Stabilizing fine sand by adding clay: laboratory wind tunnel study. Soil technology, 3(1), 21-31.
  6. -Duiker, S.W., Flanagan, D.C., Lal, R., 2001. Erodibility and infiltration characteristics of five major soils of southwest Spain. Catena, 45(2), 103-121.
  7. -Edvardsson, K., 2010. Evaluation of dust suppressants for gravel roads: Methods development and efficiency studies (Doctoral dissertation, KTH).
  8. -Ekhtesasi, M.R., Azimzadeh, H.R., Mobin, M.H., Elmi, M.R., Nekuei, M.A., 2006. Construction and optimization of wind erosion sampling devices, wind guards to set up wind erosion station in Yazd. Research project, Institute of Arid and Desert Regions. Yazd University.
  9. -Emami, H., Astaraei, A.R., 2012. Effect of organic and inorganic amendments on parameters of water retention curve, bulk density and aggregate diameter of a saline-sodic soil.
  10. -Faramehr, F., Khalil Moghadam, B., Shahbazi, A., Rahnama, M., 2014. The comparison between the abilities of eco- friendly mulches for stabilization of drifting sands of Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil Science (Water and Soil Science), 29(4), 463-474.
  11. -Fryrear, D.W., Skidmore, E.L., 1985. Methods for controlling wind erosion. Soil erosion and crop productivity, 443-457.
  12. -Genis, A., Vulfson, L., Ben-Asher, J., 2013. Combating wind erosion of sandy soils and crop damage in the coastal deserts: Wind tunnel experiments. Aeolian Research, 9, 69-73.
  13. -Gholami Tabasi, J., Jafary, M., Azarnivand, H., Sarparast, M., 2014. Studying the effect of petroleum mulch on the vegetation and soil attributes of sandy deserts (Samad Abad of Sarakhs). Desert Management, 4, 43-50.
  14. -Goodrich, B.A., Koski, R.D., Jacobi, W.R., 2009. Monitoring surface water chemistry near magnesium chloride dust suppressant treated roads in Colorado. Journal of environmental quality, 38(6), 2373-2381.
  15. -Hagen, L.J., 2010. Erosion by Wind: Modeling. Encyclopedia of Soil Science. 2nded, London: Taylor and Francis publishers.
  16. -Hazirei, F., Zare Arnani, M., 2013. Investigating the effect of clay-limestone mulch on the stabilization of sandy soils. Iranian Journal Soil and water, 27, 373-380.
  17. -He, J.J., Cai, Q.G., Tang, Z.J., 2008. Wind tunnel experimental study on the effect of PAM on soil wind erosion control. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 145(1-3), 185-193.
  18. -Jafari, M., 2014. Report of Soil Stabilization Resin, University of Tehran, Agricultural and Natural Resources Campus, Faculty of Natural Resources.
  19. -Li, X.Y., Liu, L.Y., Gong, J.D., 2001. Influence of pebble mulch on soil erosion by wind and trapping capacity for windblown sediment. Soil and Tillage Research, 59(3-4), 137-142.
  20. -Li, X.Y., 2003. Gravel–sand mulch for soil and water conservation in the semiarid loess region of northwest China. Catena, 52(2), 105-127.
  21. -Rammal, M.M., Jubair, A.A., 2015. Sand dunes stabilization using silica gel and cement kiln dust. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences, 18(2), 179-191.
  22. -Miller, G.A., Azad, S., 2000. Influence of soil type on stabilization with cement kiln dust. Construction and building materials, 14(2), 89-97.
  23. -Movahedan, M., Abbasi, N., Keramati, M., 2011. Experimental investigation of polyvinyl acetate polymer application for wind erosion control of soils.
  24. -Asl, F.N., Asgari, H.R., Emami, H., Jafari, M., 2017. Stabilization of drifting sands using micro silica-lime-clay mixture as a mulch. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(24), 536-545.
  25. -Rodriguez, M., Lopez, F.A., Pinto, M., Balcazar, N., Besga, G., 1994. Basic Linz‐Donawitz Slag as a Liming Agent for Pastureland. Agronomy Journal, 86(5), 904-909.
  26. -Samaei, H.R., Golchin, A., Mosaddeghi, M.R., 2006. Pollution control of wind erosion by water soluble polymers. Soil, Environment and Sustainable Development Conference, 8-9 November, Karaj, Iran.
  27. -Vazquez, E.V., Miranda, J.V., Gonzalez, A.P., 2005. Characterizing anisotropy and heterogeneity of soil surface microtopography using fractal models. Ecological Modelling, 182(3-4), 337-353.